4 ms·
this isn't true at all the process the work was generated through is of primary importance for copyright the existence of the concept of "derivative work" sho
by blibble 4y ago
this isn't true at all
the process the work was generated through is of primary importance for copyright
the existence of the concept of "derivative work" should make this obvious
see the reverse engineering of the IBM BIOS for another example
- CuriouslyC 4y agoThere are specific criterion for fair use: https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/four-factors/ https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/four-factors/. None of them are process specific. Maybe bone up on the law rather than getting yourself in any deeper.
- blibble 4y ago> Maybe bone up on the law rather than getting yourself in any deeper. we're not talking about fair use here buddy
- CuriouslyC 4y agoAnd that's probably why you're talking to yourself.
- blibble 4y agoMaybe try reading the thread rather than getting yourself in any deeper.
- CuriouslyC 4y agoYou're the one trying to ignore fair use as it has been broadly applied to creative works for something like 150 years, and make this about a very narrow slice of software copyright law even though people in the thread are talking about images and music. You're being willfully obtuse to try and make an argument because you are emotional about AI creative output.
- blibble 4y agoanother strawman