5 ms·
Eventually you will need to show sources and I’m sure we’ll have ways to extract sources from the models. ma these things are not magic after all.
by ChatGTP 4y ago
Eventually you will need to show sources and I’m sure we’ll have ways to extract sources from the models. ma these things are not magic after all.
- amanaplanacanal 4y agoI’m not sure why sources matter at all. In copyright you compare the end result, not how you got there.
- blibble 4y agothis isn't true at all the process the work was generated through is of primary importance for copyright the existence of the concept of "derivative work" should make this obvious see the reverse engineering of the IBM BIOS for another example
- CuriouslyC 4y agoThere are specific criterion for fair use: https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/four-factors/ https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/four-factors/. None of them are process specific. Maybe bone up on the law rather than getting yourself in any deeper.
- blibble 4y ago> Maybe bone up on the law rather than getting yourself in any deeper. we're not talking about fair use here buddy
- CuriouslyC 4y agoAnd that's probably why you're talking to yourself.
- blibble 4y agoMaybe try reading the thread rather than getting yourself in any deeper.
- CuriouslyC 4y agoYou're the one trying to ignore fair use as it has been broadly applied to creative works for something like 150 years, and make this about a very narrow slice of software copyright law even though people in the thread are talking about images and music. You're being willfully obtuse to try and make an argument because you are emotional about AI creative output.
- blibble 4y agoanother strawman
- kmeisthax 4y agoYou actually can, but only for things the model memorized: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.13188.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.13188.pdf