> So I think, to compare a human listening to an album, and a trained AI system listening to an album, yes, those two things might be reasonably analogous. Thi

> So I think, to compare a human listening to an album, and a trained AI system listening to an album, yes, those two things might be reasonably analogous. This still relies on the implicit assumption that AI and human mind work the same way. While AI and humans may generate similar-looking results, and need a similar amount of data fed into them, is that really enough evidence that they work the same way, and should therefore be treated the same way? Additionally, this analogy is ignoring the fact that human mind cannot be replicated, scaled and automated, while an AI can. Isn't that aspect highly relevant in case of producing content?