4 ms·
if generative ai needs to attribute its music, so will musicians need to attribute their creations to past artists they studied and listened to.
by bushbaba 4y ago
if generative ai needs to attribute its music, so will musicians need to attribute their creations to past artists they studied and listened to.
- EamonnMR 4y agoYou need to obtain the rights to samples you use, why should this be any different?
- phonescreen_man 4y agoGenerative music is not using samples - just as a musician who learns a song on guitar, say wonderwall and then writes a hey there Delilah is not sampling.
- jrajav 4y agoThe fact that you need to obtain the rights to samples you use has never been about any meaningful or harmful form of 'stealing' in the slightest. It was about harming hip hop and those who created it. Sampling and interpolation is a key part of many forms of music, and is a beautiful craft in and of itself. Restricting it from the outside for reasons of profit (usually completely detached from either end of the actual artistry) has never protected anyone's IP in a way that preserves and advances the art form. It 100% holds the art form back, and does nothing else of merit.
- anoncow 4y agoLike we don’t need a (sample priced) license to listen to songs, AI should be able to use regular music subscriptions to listen to music and create new music. This may eventually result in regular music subscriptions being priced closer to sample pricing.