> If I were to start with ChatGPT I would, necessarily, only say what has been said. Perhaps with ChatGPT you would actually go ahead and write that book, addi

> If I were to start with ChatGPT I would, necessarily, only say what has been said. Perhaps with ChatGPT you would actually go ahead and write that book, adding those crucial 10% of key ideas which are yours and letting it help you fill out the 90% of standard but necessary content. > If I were to start with ChatGPT I would, necessarily, only say what has been said. This is a bold claim I don't aee any evidence for. If you sample a model outaude its data (which happens all the time(, you expect to get results outside of its data.