4 ms·
Where do you draw the line between heavy editing and fully AI-generated? Some edits have little in common with the source, so at which point is the source not r
by FeistySkink 4y ago
Where do you draw the line between heavy editing and fully AI-generated? Some edits have little in common with the source, so at which point is the source not relevant anymore? What if you feed an original photo through some AI-enhanced tool like Topaz?
- hammyhavoc 4y agoWhat if you use in-camera fx like lenses, filters, lighting etc? How puritanical is what we consider photography? Is it like the puritans of guitar rejecting digital then later embracing profilers and modellers?
- brookst 4y agoAnd what about those cheaters who set up lights, or put makeup on models?
- hammyhavoc 4y agoYou probably already know about Dogme 95, but for anybody who doesn't: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogme_95 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogme_95 I can imagine more ideas of purity like this emerging as a consequence.
- shadowgovt 4y agoAmazing. This reads like a Nuzlocke Challenge for cinematography.
- brookst 4y agoI had seen Dogme ages ago, thanks for reminding me. Agree we may see more like it, but probably with about the same cultural relevance : mostly a footnote.