2 ms·
This article misses the point. Charity is a personal thing and the only person it has to be impactful for is the person doing the charity and this was definitel
by snapplebobapple 4y ago
This article misses the point. Charity is a personal thing and the only person it has to be impactful for is the person doing the charity and this was definitely impactful for ken. His ego gets a huge stroking every time his building gets mentioned in anything and he gets to flex on all the students at Harvard who walk by and use his building every day. That it isn't maximizing social welfare is pretty irrelevant.
- HDThoreaun 4y agoThe point is donating to worthless causes is morally repugnant and deserves to be derided. Sure he can do whatever he wants, and we can try to peer pressure him into making better decisions next time.