4 ms·
It is not hypocritical: whatever "Open"AI does to make GPT-4 "safer", makes it dumber. Specific example is drawing a unicorn https://youtu.be/qbIk7-JPB2c https:
by d0mine 4y ago
It is not hypocritical: whatever "Open"AI does to make GPT-4 "safer", makes it dumber. Specific example is drawing a unicorn https://youtu.be/qbIk7-JPB2c https://youtu.be/qbIk7-JPB2c
- cs702 4y agoWow: Making GPT4 safer also made it worse at creative tasks. I did not expect to see that in response to my question.
- giardini 4y agoI would expect that b/c creative people are usually very iconoclastic and part of their thinking process is to ignore conceptual barriers (esp, social barriers) in search of solutions.
- cs702 4y agoThat insight was the motivation for my question: If creativity by human beings requires them "to ignore conceptual barriers (esp. social barriers)," as you write, won't creativity by AI require it to do so as well? What I did not expect to see is that there's already evidence that LLMs get less creative when you try to make them safer!
- 6510 4y agoCannibalism would solve many of our problems. We can set a maximum age. Limit the number of children in various ways. Require active contributions to society. Engineer diseases. Organize large wars. Access to literature, education, training and solving the food logistics problem is quite obviously the most attractive solution.