7 ms·
What? Nobody is arguing that companies should avoid paying employees. How are you reading that? For the overwhelming majority of jobs, you get paid only what's
by Edd314159 4y ago
What? Nobody is arguing that companies should avoid paying employees. How are you reading that?
For the overwhelming majority of jobs, you get paid only what's in your contract. If that number is not enough, fine, renegotiate it if you are able. But employers cannot be expected to pay you more than you're entitled to.
- fmajid 4y agoSmall unexpected gifts have a disproportionate positive effect on morale: https://salesandmarketing.com/psychology-behind-unexpected-rewards/ https://salesandmarketing.com/psychology-behind-unexpected-r...
- simplotek 4y ago> What? Nobody is arguing that companies should avoid paying employees. How are you reading that? What? You're making those claims. You're coming with bullshit excuses like "expectation of more money that nobody agreed upon". This blend of bullshit talk doesn't pop up when some unexpected event hits and everyone is suddenly expected to "be a team player", and crunch time hits and the boss expects everyone to "go above and beyond". You better believe this investment road goes both ways. Being a team player means getting a share of all team wins, and a cold slice of pizza ain't it. > For the overwhelming majority of jobs, you get paid only what's in your contract. You're talking like yearly bonuses or performance reviews don't happen, and no one receives paid bonuses ever. Why are you pretending that employees don't get compensated by the value they create?