3 ms·
I think the argument is: you don't know if the tech was made by a person -- it might have been made by an AI. Do you wait to learn if a person was involved befo
by dpkirchner 4y ago
I think the argument is: you don't know if the tech was made by a person -- it might have been made by an AI. Do you wait to learn if a person was involved before declaring it innovative (or creative)?
- AlecSchueler 4y agoBut the original argument was that it could only have been made by a human, either the human who made it themselves or the human who prompted the AI.