3 ms·
This should have been solved technically, not politically. Why not set cookie rules in the browser settings, and handle at http standard level?
by febeling 3y ago
This should have been solved technically, not politically. Why not set cookie rules in the browser settings, and handle at http standard level?
- jeltz 3y agoBecause Google owns the largest browser. The problem could only be solved politically.
- goodluckchuck 3y agoNo, that proves the problem could not be solved politically, because regulators lacked the political power needed to regulate google
- regularjack 3y agoIf they would try to regulate google, that would be a political measure. How would they "regulate google" in a technical way?
- jeltz 3y agoBut GDPR was their way of regulating Google. It is not perfect but it was a huge step in the right direction.
- goodluckchuck 3y agoI thought GDPR regulated the cookies that websites are allowed to request to store on users devices. Does it also cover tracking built into browsers by Google, Microsoft, etc.?
- Nextgrid 3y agoGDPR and those data processing consent flows are about data collection and processing in general and not a specific technical means of doing so - it would also apply to IP addresses, browser fingerprinting, information manually entered (such as delivery address when placing an e-commerce order) or a hypothetical crystal ball that actually worked.
- matsemann 3y agoHow would the browser discern between legitimate 1st part cookies and illegal privacy violating ones? It's not a technical problem, it needs laws. And for GDPR and other privacy rules, cookies aren't even a thing. The laws doesn't care about the medium you use. They apply beyond technicalities. For instance you could track IP addresses and a browser would have no way to stop you. GDPR makes it illegal without involving new crazy tech.