3 ms·
Of course it was innovative as the person behind the creation had to innovate to make it, as I understand the position.
by AlecSchueler 4y ago
Of course it was innovative as the person behind the creation had to innovate to make it, as I understand the position.
- dpkirchner 4y agoI think the argument is: you don't know if the tech was made by a person -- it might have been made by an AI. Do you wait to learn if a person was involved before declaring it innovative (or creative)?
- AlecSchueler 4y agoBut the original argument was that it could only have been made by a human, either the human who made it themselves or the human who prompted the AI.