6 ms·
> be distributed among the parties in cahoots: the Microsoft employee(s) involved in the scheme, the partner, and the decision maker at the purchasing entity F
by shapefrog 3y ago
> be distributed among the parties in cahoots: the Microsoft employee(s) involved in the scheme, the partner, and the decision maker at the purchasing entity
Fraud.
> In the government had paid $5.5 million for Microsoft licenses for hardware they did not possess
Microsoft being paid for something doesnt sound like Microsoft bribing someone.
> Qatar’s Ministry of Education was paying $9.5 million annually over seven years for Microsoft Office
Microsoft being paid for something doesnt sound like Microsoft bribing someone.
I too have a Microsoft 365 subscription that keeps autorenewing that I never use.
- justsomehnguy 3y ago> Fraud. If the money passed through a 3rd-party which took the cut then it's not even a fraud, because it's up to the purchasing entity to use [or not] the discount. Like sure, it's an obvious collusion but from the point of law there is nothing wrong here. > I too have a Microsoft 365 subscription that keeps autorenewing that I never use. And this is the gist of most of OP woes.