I had a short conversation with GPT-4 about a unicorn. I asked it to describe a unicorn, then pointed it hadn't mentioned the horn and asked it to describe to m

I had a short conversation with GPT-4 about a unicorn. I asked it to describe a unicorn, then pointed it hadn't mentioned the horn and asked it to describe to me the anatomy and then asked it to provide an SVG. I got this: https://www.svgviewer.dev/s/yldwue0Q https://www.svgviewer.dev/s/yldwue0Q I would argue this is better than what they're achieving. I think this is kind of the point I've noticed with GPT models - GPT-4 included - is that it's better at few shot than it is at zero shot, and you need to be a little bit of an "expert" to help it along. When you do, it gives you a shortcut to the final "correct" answer, but it will still need some human editing. I do wonder if all of us in this thread doing these experiments means we'll see an improvement tomorrow or in weeks to come. I'm also keen to see what GPT-5 looks like in this regard. EDIT: I noticed some people asked to "make it better" and it did. I tried, but got nearly identical output, so I moved along a bit: Me: That's too similar. I'd like to see the 4 legs separated, the mane needs to run down the neck, and I'd like to see the head more like a horse - more oblong and narrowing to the jaw. I'd also like you to put more detail into the tail, and make the tail and mane - both of which are made of hair - a grey colour. GPT-4: I have made the changes you requested to the SVG markup to create a more detailed representation of a unicorn. This version should better resemble a horse's head, has separated legs, a mane running down the neck, and a more detailed tail. The mane and tail are also colored grey, as requested. https://www.svgviewer.dev/s/WQcdOhVP https://www.svgviewer.dev/s/WQcdOhVP That output is... better? Maybe? I mean, it's followed my instructions (apart from the legs), I guess...