4 ms·
In case anyone got confused like me, the story is not about the Salesforce Tower, the tallest building in SF. The company has a 15-year lease on half of that bu
by fshbbdssbbgdd 4y ago
In case anyone got confused like me, the story is not about the Salesforce Tower, the tallest building in SF. The company has a 15-year lease on half of that building, and I doubt they would be able to unload that much space at any reasonable price in the current market. They are leaving Salesforce East, one of several nearby buildings where the company has also leased some floors.
- cheeze 4y agoAs someone who knows little about this and isn't from SF, I feel like that title, while technically correct, is pretty damn clickbait-y
- mertd 4y agoThey really tried hard to make it sound like SF is leaving "the" Salesforce tower.
- blululu 4y agoThis is why I read the comment section of HN before clicking the link. It makes sense that Salesforce would want to reduce their office space after laying off ~10% of their workers, but title of the article really should be changed to reflect that the fact that they are not vacating the Salesforce tower.