4 ms·

Extending the line of thought of OP sure is. It's not $country's fault that you don't use vpn or port knocking.

by neoromantique 4y ago

jacquesm 4y ago
It is $country's fault that there is a free reign for criminals, either state sponsored or acting on their own.
- from 4y ago
  I'm guessing here but it seems that the majority of the world pursues cybercrime investigations with foreign victims at the same rate as Russia, which is about 0 (unless for some reason we're all just never hearing about this great computer crime police work in Africa/Latam). Several African countries can't even pay government employee salaries on time, are they really going to be sending records requests to Google or Yahoo or Binance, infiltrating underground forums, or developing informants? Nigeria in the best case hands off the BEC suspects to America but rarely does police work themselves.
  - jacquesm 4y ago
    Interpol regularly goes after cybercriminals, they do require local cooperation but that happens more and more frequently. But obviously there are still places where this isn't a priority.
- neoromantique 4y ago
  1) if your threat model is blocking direct connections from countries you deem unworthy, then I don't even know where to begin unpacking levels of wrong here. 2) proxies exist, many of which are your "first world residential ip address" thanks to IoT in every toaster.
  - jacquesm 4y ago
    Can you stop moving the goalposts. You said 'blocking countries equals xenophobia'. It doesn't.
    - neoromantique 4y ago
      You are talking in a thread where OP called such countries “self-proclaimed vermin” and you’re parroting terrible and restrictive opsec practices. No, it is not okay that many US websites decided to block access from EU instead of adopting a normal privacy policy, it is equally not okay to block access from whole regions of the world based on your prejudice, there are much better solutions.

Extending the line of thought of OP sure is. It's not $country's fault that you don't use vpn or port knocking.

jacquesm 4y ago

It is $country's fault that there is a free reign for criminals, either state sponsored or acting on their own.

from 4y ago
I'm guessing here but it seems that the majority of the world pursues cybercrime investigations with foreign victims at the same rate as Russia, which is about 0 (unless for some reason we're all just never hearing about this great computer crime police work in Africa/Latam). Several African countries can't even pay government employee salaries on time, are they really going to be sending records requests to Google or Yahoo or Binance, infiltrating underground forums, or developing informants? Nigeria in the best case hands off the BEC suspects to America but rarely does police work themselves.
- jacquesm 4y ago
  Interpol regularly goes after cybercriminals, they do require local cooperation but that happens more and more frequently. But obviously there are still places where this isn't a priority.
neoromantique 4y ago
1) if your threat model is blocking direct connections from countries you deem unworthy, then I don't even know where to begin unpacking levels of wrong here. 2) proxies exist, many of which are your "first world residential ip address" thanks to IoT in every toaster.
- jacquesm 4y ago
  Can you stop moving the goalposts. You said 'blocking countries equals xenophobia'. It doesn't.
  - neoromantique 4y ago
    You are talking in a thread where OP called such countries “self-proclaimed vermin” and you’re parroting terrible and restrictive opsec practices. No, it is not okay that many US websites decided to block access from EU instead of adopting a normal privacy policy, it is equally not okay to block access from whole regions of the world based on your prejudice, there are much better solutions.