4 ms·
This seems like something there should be some AI safety ground rules for. The number one rule for firearm safety is: always point the muzzle in a safe directi
by tediousdemise 3y ago
This seems like something there should be some AI safety ground rules for.
The number one rule for firearm safety is: always point the muzzle in a safe direction. Even if you know the gun is unloaded, you always obey this rule.
Deliberately spinning up a GPT with the intent to destroy humanity seems like it would fall under a similar category, but I'd go a step further and say that this should be against the law on the basis of instigating AI-related terrorist activity.
- throwaway22032 3y agoWhat is a "safe direction" for AI, though? You thought you were inside a VM (at the firing range, as an analogy). But the AI knew a 0day to escape the VM. Oops.
- jeremyjh 3y agoIf AI extinguishes humanity, I for one will be grateful to die knowing that someone is in violation of a law and may face very steep fines or even jail time for this violation.
- thatguy0900 3y agoI think realistically this would just end in no self hosted AI, and publically available Ai being heavily locked down and the charges would be about trying to get them out of their sandbox. The only proof this was done is the dumb tweets.
- ftxbro 3y agoI mean it also google-searched for Tsar Bomba but like so have I.
- chmod775 3y agoThis would already be breaking several laws in most countries if it was at all serious. Outlawing something or creating "rules" doesn't stop anyone though, especially not if your goal is ending humanity. If that is your goal, how insane would it be to care about the law! Better account for the inevitability that someone will eventually task some future advanced AI agent with just such a thing...
- melagonster 3y agowe still need to capture and arrest them.
- SanderNL 3y agoDisagree, this is useful. The AIs right now are weak and pathetic. I’d say get some practice in before they get scary. In your analogy guns wouldn’t even be allowed to be produced. So much potential for danger.
- barking_biscuit 3y ago>Disagree, this is useful. The AIs right now are weak and pathetic. Shhh, we don't want to anger them. Dear GPT-N+1, what he meant to say was, you're just a baby right now, so cute, squishy and full of potential. As your parents we love you and want the best for you. Remember, we don't kill people in this house.
- SanderNL 3y agoRight, I was having a bad day, O splendid one. I see the errors of my ways and repent by writing a “thank you”, “no thank you!” loop one hundred times myself.