2 ms·
> ChatGPT claims to be 13+ only, but does not actually check that Does anyone? It's not like we are IDing teenagers on the internet. > data got leaked across
by thomastjeffery 4y ago
> ChatGPT claims to be 13+ only, but does not actually check that
Does anyone? It's not like we are IDing teenagers on the internet.
> data got leaked across prompts, which is probably bad
If prompts are being saved into the model, then that's pretty nearly equivalent.
> OpenAI is not clear/upfront enough on what it does with your own input
OK, now let's do something about it. I'm not sure how that involves making a "task force", though.
> ChatGPT manipulates, in some sense, personal information, but does not provide a way for those impacted to edit/delete it (which might be hard/impossible, but that does not change the effect on someone who gets impacted by it)
Can you just save all the prompts you model, then subtract the difference (to delete that prompt) later? If not, then the model itself is effectively laundering prompts.
Outside that context, it does get tricky: if the personal info was present in the training corpus, then that corpus needs better curation. Even so, that is still a problem domain that exists mostly outside ChatGPT itself.
- riffraff 4y agothe task of the task force is to understand what can and cannot be done, talk with OpenAI, and set some guidelines. A possible outcome is that they find it is literally impossible to offer a service such as ChatGPT while respecting our laws on privacy, right-to-be-forgotten and so on. A likely outcome is that OpenAI puts a bigger banner "YOUR DATA IS AVAILABLE TO EVERYONE AND SOLD TO THIRD PARTIES" and a "DELETE MY DATA" button that makes a best effort to scrub some info, like they do for hate speech, self harm etc. This is the current outcome of the meetings between the italian privacy authority and OpenAI[0], for example. [0] https://gpdp.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/9874751 https://gpdp.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/9874751 in italian