2 ms·
The references section is odd to me — it is both present and missing what is clearly either one authoritative source or a whole month or more of research. I won
by svnt 4y ago
The references section is odd to me — it is both present and missing what is clearly either one authoritative source or a whole month or more of research. I wonder why it isn’t included.
edit:
I would be surprised if this wasn’t one of the primary sources, and it cites its sources:
http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/inanaitar/ http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/inanaitar/