9 ms·
They've not reduced waste, they're just producing less waste than they were before. Meanwhile, the drop in the bucket they've "reduced" can't be repeated elsewh
by zdragnar 4y ago
They've not reduced waste, they're just producing less waste than they were before. Meanwhile, the drop in the bucket they've "reduced" can't be repeated elsewhere across not only their industry but others, so it is a relatively unremarkable change.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> not reduced waste, they're just producing less waste than they were before Recycling literally reduces the quantity of waste. > the drop in the bucket they've "reduced" can't be repeated elsewhere You're Zeno's arrowing a big problem by dismissing incremental progress.
- dpkonofa 4y ago>They've not reduced waste, they're just producing less waste than they were before. reduce (n) - To bring down, as in extent, amount, or degree; diminish. synonym: decrease. This is the worst kind of pedantic because it's also wrong. They have reduced waste production and they recycle existing waste. How is that not reducing waste?
- Analemma_ 4y ago> They've not reduced waste, they're just producing less waste than they were before. This is quite a sentence.