> I wouldn't be surprised if hiring decisions and admissions are also guided or influenced by such new ideological policing. They are. If this is what they do

> I wouldn't be surprised if hiring decisions and admissions are also guided or influenced by such new ideological policing. They are. If this is what they do openly, just imagine how severe the tacit, unofficial discrimination is, that they don't (yet) dare write down as official policy: Study: Diversity Statements Required for One-Fifth of Academic Jobs - https://freebeacon.com/campus/study-diversity-statements-required-for-one-fifth-of-academic-jobs/ https://freebeacon.com/campus/study-diversity-statements-req... The University’s New Loyalty Oath [..] Required ‘diversity and inclusion’ statements amount to a political litmus test for hiring. - https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-universitys-new-loyalty-oath-11576799749 https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-universitys-new-loyalty-oat... Berkeley Weeded Out Job Applicants Who Didn't Propose Specific Plans To Advance Diversity [..] In one example, of a pool of 894 candidates was narrowed down to 214 based solely on how convincing their plans to spread diversity were. - https://reason.com/2020/02/03/university-of-california-diversity-initiative-berkeley/ https://reason.com/2020/02/03/university-of-california-diver...