6 ms·
Nuclear in France worked very well for decades although it had some hiccups last year. Meanwhile German coal plants are still working despite the considerable i
by Krssst 4y ago
Nuclear in France worked very well for decades although it had some hiccups last year. Meanwhile German coal plants are still working despite the considerable installed renewable capacity.
Having so much available renewable electricity that German coal plants would almost shut down for a few days would be a newsworthy event. For France not burning coal is just a regular day (except for last year's hiccups).
- PurpleRamen 4y agoTrue, but Germany is shutting down coal too. There is just a bit of delay, for multiple reasons, but mostly because of war and politics.
- ChuckNorris89 4y agoThat couldn't be more false. Coal burning in Germany is at its peak. They're even tearing down old villages to mine coal.
- PurpleRamen 4y agoThe current peak is because of Russia. Coal is used to replace gas, on which they had not much choice. And this peak is supposed to stop in summer. We will see if it will work out. But the phase-out is a long investment and the current plan targets 2038, so it is there. A crucial point is, coal is an important part of some industries, and they have started moving hard to replace it there, so there is a good chance it will work this time. They already tried that 20 years ago, until some corrupt people figured out it's more profitable to move slow, as nobody cared anyway.
- ChuckNorris89 4y ago>The current peak is because of Russia. No. It's also because they moronically shut down nuclear right after Russia happened instead of keeping it longer. Since they can't replace gas too easily, the coal peak will be longer into the future not just current. >Coal is used to replace gas No. Coal is used to generate electricity. Do you know what else they could have used to generate electricity? Nuclear. The reasoning you provided is just the same ol' anti-nuclear propaganda spewed all over German politics and media: "Oh, it's Russia's fault. We can only use coal. Never nuclear."
- PurpleRamen 4y ago> No. Coal is used to generate electricity. No, in the first place it's used to generate heat, which is also used for generating electricity, but also to heat up homes and other systems. Nuclear Plants are simply not in a location where they can serve this purpose.
- themaninthedark 4y agoGermany is centrally burning gas and then distributing the heat to houses? And they had to switch their gas plants over to coal because Russia? I thought they just restarted old coal plants.
- PurpleRamen 4y agoYes, it's called district heating or teleheating. And generally is heat also a form of energy used in some other processes, not just for heating up buildings or streets. Energy-politic is far more complex than electricity and building big plants.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoAnd the year before. And the year before that. And a few years before that. And a decade before that. All while accumulating massive debts and deferred maintenance (and relying on german coal).
- Krssst 4y agoLast year was bad but things looked fine before. Export some days, import some others. Deferred maintenance was because of COVID. I'd rather my country have debts than burn coal in large amount for decade (likely decades) to come.