They want to say they're distinct from other "state media outlets" because their editorial agenda isn't the same as their sponsoring state's agenda. However, th

They want to say they're distinct from other "state media outlets" because their editorial agenda isn't the same as their sponsoring state's agenda. However, they don't want to admit that they do have an editorial agenda, because then people might ask who decides what that agenda is. If the state pays for their work but doesn't direct it, who is directing it? That it is based on common goals of Truth and Public Good seems a bit of a stretch, given the lack of diversity of opinion in their coverage.