2 ms·
I agree on the ratings. I struggled with a way to convey that this is not a school where you would even imagine alumni caring about. It’s the school to go to wh
by prepend 4y ago
I agree on the ratings. I struggled with a way to convey that this is not a school where you would even imagine alumni caring about. It’s the school to go to when you don’t get into the state university and don’t get into the secondary state university. Not that it’s bad, it’s just not a place that should have 5 people working on this task.
So at I thought that the ranking shows that they haven’t even gotten to the point of joining the grift of rankings. It’s rated between 400-500.
It’s hard to truly rank universities in general or even in specific subject areas and, for me, it falls into the unquantifiable reputation realm.
I grew up with Bill Gates and Paul Allen and Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs and other successful college dropouts so I always felt I wanted to look at output and production rather than credentials. But of course, I have to settle for medical boards and whatnot and the drawbacks of that as there’s no way I can or am willing to evaluate cardiologists based solely on their work. Artists and coders, sure.
- tough 4y agothanks god cardiology isn't my calling