3 ms·
I'd go about it an alternative way rather than going after the judges: design a network resistant to censorship in the first place. If content can be taken down
by aboringusername 3y ago
I'd go about it an alternative way rather than going after the judges: design a network resistant to censorship in the first place. If content can be taken down this easily then society has a problem.
Instead, just make a network where you can't just pull out a plug, or click a button to erase information just because somebody somewhere is upset.
But the typical web is just built for mass consumption and is easily manipulated.
- bharathyes 3y agosome already exists but adoption rate is slow for few reasons like not needed for most people or the type of content they host, the crawbacks compared to off-the-shelf hostings when you don't need a censor proof solution, no standard or stable solution ( multiple new products keeps proping up). The technology alone will never be enough or widely available if the judicial or legislature keep attacking and restricting their use.
- account42 3y agoUnless you get the majority of the population to rely on your network somehow then the government can simply end up outlawing all methods to access that network.