3 ms·

I think it is still a problem that many people do not know how GPT really works. There is no part in GPT that can figure out something. So no intelligence and n

by fxj 3y ago

I think it is still a problem that many people do not know how GPT really works. There is no part in GPT that can figure out something. So no intelligence and no learning of things. A good example is when you look at GPT writing poems. All poems that it writes are of the same structure and they are not very good. So it seems it does not know the difference between a sonnet and a limmerick. But what happens is, that there is a miss-alignment between writing a poem and making the user happy. GPT is trained that its highest goal is to make the user happy. GPT believes that users dont know what sonnets are anyway so i can get away with a rhyme that is not a sonnet. Here is a good video about that: https://youtu.be/viJt_DXTfwA?t=1376 https://youtu.be/viJt_DXTfwA?t=1376

Turing_Machine 3y ago
>> A good example is when you look at GPT writing poems. All poems that it writes are of the same structure and they are not very good. Wait: so anyone who doesn't know what a sonnet is (or who writes bad poetry), is somehow unintelligent? Is the goal here not "do something that would have previously taken a human-level brain to do", but rather "perform every task better than every human". That seems like setting the bar a little high to me.