4 ms·
It would actually 'solve' the problem by limiting the border to a manageable size. However that's the wrong solution to the wrong problem. It should never hav
by mjevans 4y ago
It would actually 'solve' the problem by limiting the border to a manageable size.
However that's the wrong solution to the wrong problem.
It should never have been about blindly stopping everyone. America used to have the right idea, paperclip in the best and brightest to fuel the next business revolution. A rational policy isn't about denial, it's about control and management. To legalize, to tax (profit from), to regulate.
Seasonal labor work visas, documented workers; and for the workers, safer working conditions and better pay (though still not the pay a farm would have to give Americans to make them want to do that job). Even a real process for identifying an applicant's history so that refugees can be integrated, positive influences can be allowed through, and criminals can be (mostly) stopped at the border.
- FooBarBizBazz 4y ago> It would actually 'solve' the problem by limiting the border to a manageable size. The natural southern border is Panama. That's where you want your bunkers and siege tanks.