The author starts with type I and II errors the question has yielded that somehow they're proud of it. With performance like that, I'd call it a "trash intervi

The author starts with type I and II errors the question has yielded that somehow they're proud of it. With performance like that, I'd call it a "trash interview question". When you use wildly inaccurate processes, you build bad teams and good people know you'd be wasting their time so they don't even go in the door.