3 ms·
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35526453 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35526453
by gdprrrr 4y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35526453 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35526453
- dale_glass 4y agoTempest in a teapot. Standard trademark stuff really.
- account42 4y agoBeing standard does not mean it cannot be criticized.
- dale_glass 4y agoIt can be, but there's no need for paranoia. It's weird really. Trademarks are IMO about the least objectionable kind of IP. They're there to serve normal people, and are simple enough to work around if needed with no loss in functionality. Very much unlike patents or copyright.
- antonvs 4y agoThe criticisms don’t seem valid, though. Projects have to function within the law, and pretty much any popular project has to address these legal issues. Here’s the Linux page about its trademark, for example: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/legal/the-linux-mark https://www.linuxfoundation.org/legal/the-linux-mark > The Linux Foundation protects the public and Linux users from unauthorized and confusing uses of the trademark and authorizes proper uses of the mark through an accessible sublicensing program.