8 ms·

ESA – Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer: Live Launch

181 points by laktak 4y ago

exitb 4y ago
That mission features a complex trajectory that will use a lot of gravity assist to get to Jupiter. It will actually take eight years to get there, while Juno needed five and the Voyagers only two. Why do recent missions choose to do that? Is that a cost saving measure?
- dogma1138 4y ago
  The voyagers were launched within very specific window iirc which is why they managed to get to the outer planets so quickly. Also the voyagers only did a flyby so they could afford to go as fast as they want as they didn’t needed to enter orbit. The length of time to get to Jupiter is pretty much dictated by orbital mechanics. As well as your ability to slow down and actually get into orbit instead of just doing a flyby. So the longer journey is likely a combination of the launch vehicle, the cruise stage vehicle and how much fuel they want to dedicate into getting into orbit vs the mission since the probe is expected to visit multiple moons it’s likely that they prioritize the fuel for in mission orbit corrections so they are taking a longer and slower approach.
  - exitb 4y ago
    Well, sure, the window was very specific to visit multiple planets, but Jupiter was the first stop. Similar Earth-Jupiter configuration happens every year.
    - avar 4y ago
      The ISS made a "stop" in my general vicinity earlier today by your definition of "stop".
      - exitb 4y ago
        Sorry, English it not my first language, I meant it as a first destination, it obviously just flew by.
    - dogma1138 4y ago
      Jupiter makes an orbit around the sun once every 12 years there likely are years where it is closer to earth than others. Also there are years when it’s retrograde and there are years when it’s prograde so there is that too. With Voyager it also wasn’t just Jupiter it was an alignment of all the planets which is far rarer. And again voyager didn’t entered orbit it had a very brief flyby of Jupiter. Cassini also took a decade to reach Saturn because it needed to enter orbit around it and its moons.
- detuur 4y ago
  The Voyager missions were able to use a rare and convenient alignment of the planets that would slingshot them into deep space. Juno is orbiting Jupiter itself, which is not a hard thing to do in our solar system. JUICE is attempting flybys of several of Jupiter moons, to end up orbiting around Ganymede. This is a much more delicate orbital insertion and has much stricter requirements for the gravity assists on its way there.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- bauruine 4y ago
  JUICE has a launch mass of 5,963 kg while Juno had 3,625 kg and Voyager only 721.9 kg. I guess it may be a limit of the launch vehicle and the mass the spacecrafts have.
  - JanKanis 4y ago
    Indeed. The same rocket will give a light probe a much higher velocity than a large probe. The launch vehicle for JUICE is the Ariane 5 ECA which can launch 16 tonnes to low earth orbit[1], while the Titan IIIE that launched the Voyagers had a capability of 15.4 tonnes to a (lower) low earth orbit[2]. So the current launch vehicle is a bit more powerful, but not 8 times as much. There are some more powerful (and more expensive) rockets active at the time, but nothing 8 times as powerful as the Titan IIIE. So NASA has the choice of 1) launching a lighter/smaller probe with less scientific capabilities and endurance, 2) spend $$$ and time developing a much more powerful launch vehicle, or 3) have a few years of patience waiting for JUICE to get to Jupiter on a slower trajectory. Jupiter has already been visited by multiple probes so sending a small and not very capable probe would not gain us much scientifically. (But this option was taken with the New Horizons probe to Pluto some years ago.) (2) Wouldn't actually be faster and much much much more expensive (see how long the SLS rocket is taking to get done. But mr. Musk is taking this route too with SpaceX's Starship, so this will be an option in the future if all goes well). So that leaves option 3, which NASA has taken. They could probably have opted for an existing more powerful and expensive launcher to shave some years off the transit, but they preferred to wait a bit longer and not spend that money. [1]: http://www.astronautix.com/a/ariane5eca.html http://www.astronautix.com/a/ariane5eca.html [2]: http://www.astronautix.com/t/titaniiie.html http://www.astronautix.com/t/titaniiie.html
    - dividedbyzero 4y ago
      > So NASA has the choice of ... > So that leaves option 3, which NASA has taken. As far as I'm aware, JUICE is an ESA probe. NASA is providing one of the instruments, but I believe that's it.
- mpweiher 4y ago
  The Voyagers took advantage of a special constellation that doesn't happen often: "In the 1960s, mission designers at JPL noted that the next occurrence of a once-every-175-year alignment of the outer planets would happen in the late 1970s. A spacecraft could take advantage of this opportunity to fly by Jupiter and use its gravity to bend its trajectory to visit Saturn, and repeat the process to also visit Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto." https://www.nasa.gov/feature/45-years-ago-voyager-1-begins-its-epic-journey-to-the-outer-planets-and-beyond https://www.nasa.gov/feature/45-years-ago-voyager-1-begins-i...
  - perihelions 4y ago
    That didn't affect the Earth-Jupiter leg, which was direct.
    - GravitasFailure 4y ago
      If I'm reading the specs correctly the Titan IIIE was a significantly more powerful vehicle than the Ariane 5 while launching a much smaller payload. JUICE also has to be going slow enough to enter orbit without carrying an insane amount of fuel for braking while Voyager just did a flyby.
      - perihelions 4y ago
        - "Titan IIIE was a significantly more powerful vehicle than the Ariane 5 while launching a much smaller payload" Yes, with a fourth stage. (I don't think it's particularly that modern rockets can't integrate such a solid-rocket boost stage, but rather there's no payload that needs this). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_(rocket_stage) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_(rocket_stage) - "JUICE also has to be going slow enough to enter orbit without carrying an insane amount of fuel for braking while Voyager just did a flyby" The flyby speeds are similar; but JUICE takes a time to get to that speed. It's not really that difficult to capture into Jupiter. Parent's link [3] says it's only 900 m/s for JUICE. Part of the reason is the extremely deep gravity well; and another is that the moons are large enough to give you effective gravity assists, within the orbit of Jupiter.
- eep_social 4y ago
  Efficiency [1] in the form of reduced delta-v requirements [2]. The “yellow book” assessment study report probably has even more details [3]. [1] https://theconversation.com/the-much-anticipated-juice-mission-to-jupiter-launches-today-heres-what-it-might-discover-203669 https://theconversation.com/the-much-anticipated-juice-missi... [2] https://www.lpi.usra.edu/opag/mar2012/presentations/Friday/5_JUICE_Summary.pdf https://www.lpi.usra.edu/opag/mar2012/presentations/Friday/5... [3] https://sci.esa.int/web/juice/-/49837-juice-assessment-study-report-yellow-book https://sci.esa.int/web/juice/-/49837-juice-assessment-study...
  - perihelions 4y ago
    Here's a key figure [3]: - "The mass injected into the Earth escape trajectory would be 4800 kg (without launch adapter), with a hyperbolic escape velocity of 3.15 km/s, which increases to 9.5 km/s after the last Earth swing-by" The Voyagers were launched directly to hyperbolic excess of >10 km/s — comparable to the speed JUICE will reach on its third flyby, of Earth, in 2029. https://sci-hub.ru/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.06.013 https://sci-hub.ru/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.06.013 ("C₃ of... 105.5 km²/s² and 102.4 km²/s² for Voyagers 1 and 2, respectively [75]")
    - mytailorisrich 4y ago
      Voyager was also only weighing 773kg. The mass of JUICE is probably a big parameter here.
- euroderf 4y ago
  I wonder what the predictions are like. When it finally gets to Jupiter, eight years from now, do we know now where the moons will be ? To what accuracy ?
  - hermitcrab 4y ago
    I believe orbits are chaotic over a timespan of many millions of years (due to weak interactions with multiple other bodies), but accurately predictable over a human lifespan.
    - euroderf 4y ago
      I just wonder whether they can say that, on date&time X1 (98% sure to be accurate within E1 hours) we know satellite Z will be X2 thousands of km away (98% sure to be accurate within E2 km).
- shagie 4y ago
  https://trajbrowser.arc.nasa.gov/traj_browser.php https://trajbrowser.arc.nasa.gov/traj_browser.php In particular https://trajbrowser.arc.nasa.gov/traj_browser.php?NEAs=on&NECs=on&chk_maxMag=on&maxMag=25&chk_maxOCC=on&maxOCC=4&chk_target_list=on&target_list=Jupiter&mission_class=oneway&mission_type=rendezvous&LD1=2015&LD2=2030&maxDT=9.5&DTunit=yrs&maxDV=7.0&min=DV&wdw_width=-1&submit=Search#a_load_results https://trajbrowser.arc.nasa.gov/traj_browser.php?NEAs=on&NE... This EVEEJ route doesn’t appear to be in the trajectory list, but it’s interesting to explore and see the various windows.
- belter 4y ago
  [1]: "From Earth to Jupiter...JUICE trajectory is designed by ESOC Mission Analysis team. It is the result of an optimization, iterated with ESA project and Airbus teams, aiming at maximizing the dry mass at launch, keeping the total mass within the launcher capabilities and minimizing the transfer duration, while respecting other mission constraints, like total radiation dose, minimum Sun distance and maximum eclipse duration..." [1] - "JUICE interplanetary operations design drivers and challenges" - https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2018-2493 https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2018-2493 This is also an interesting Thesis on optimization required for the flybys due to the uncertainty of the Moons positions on arrival : "Preliminary Navigation Analysis for the Flyby Tour of ESA’s JUICE Mission" - An investigation on the trajectory correction maneuvers design https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:455ec2e9-a36b-445c-a9ae-ef6acbbf58f8/datastream/OBJ/download https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:455ec2e9...
- saberdancer 4y ago
  Cost saving as there is no prestige or gain in coming fast or first. Probes are also bigger and heavier.
- usrusr 4y ago
  Much higher confidence to not mess up those gravity assists? Control and sensors have come a long way since then
- Sharlin 4y ago
  The Voyagers, besides their much lower mass, were flyby missions. They could afford to be fast because they didn’t need to slow down for orbit insertion. NASA’s Europa Clipper, due to launch in Oct 2024 on a Falcon 9, will take 5.5 years to get to Jupiter. The Congress directed NASA to investigate the option to launch it on an SLS, should one be available (it won’t, and it would be ridiculously expensive) – it would have been able to send the probe on a direct ~1.5 year Hohmann transfer to Jupiter without gravity assists, but no other existing launch vehicle could do that.
- rbanffy 4y ago
  It's always a tradeoff. For every kilogram of propellant you save on the trip, you get one extra kilogram for the payload. Also, you may end up bumping into payload limits of the launcher itself, so you can get there, but you'll need to take the scenic route with fewer delta-v tolls.
- vikingerik 4y ago
  It's cost saving, but the cost saved is really weight (mass) of the fuel. Using the gravity assists means you can save on fuel and use that mass for the spacecraft and its instruments instead. JUICE masses 2400 kg, where Juno is 1600 and the Voyagers were 700.
fbn79 4y ago
Save the date. If all goes right, expected arrival 2031.
- speps 4y ago
  "Alexa, set a reminder for juice in July 2031"
  - retSava 4y ago
    "I'm sorry, I didn't understand that. Here are some shopping results for furniture and sexual performance enhancer pills."
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
WeylandYutani 4y ago
ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS, EXCEPT EUROPA. ATTEMPT NO LANDING THERE. USE THEM TOGETHER. USE THEM IN PEACE.
- belter 4y ago
  Now that you mention that...The mission will conclude with a crash on Ganymede. I guess from then on a bunch of Tardigrades will be the new population. Surprised they went with this decision.
  - calcifer 4y ago
    > Surprised they went with this decision. ESA explains it like this [1]: > Category II missions are flyby or orbiter missions that venture to worlds where there may be some possibility of life, but the chances of contamination are slim. Then there's category III, where the chances of contamination are deemed greater. > The planetary protection classification for Ganymede is driven by the likelihood that living organisms from Earth, brought to Ganymede by the spacecraft, can make their way down to the ice-ocean interface [...] In turn, this likelihood is deemed so low for Ganymede that it justifies a category II protection level, allowing for the spacecraft to be disposed on Ganymede's surface. [1] https://www.space.com/europe-juice-jupiter-mission-planetary-protection https://www.space.com/europe-juice-jupiter-mission-planetary...
  - pklausler 4y ago
    If tardigrades can survive launch, deep space, Jovian orbital conditions for years, and a crash on Ganymede, and then be able to reproduce, maybe they deserve to be there.
    - belter 4y ago
      That is no problem for tardigrades. "Tiny animals survive exposure to space" - https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/Research/Tiny_animals_survive_exposure_to_space https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Ex...
  - 4y ago
robin_reala 4y ago
Launch scrubbed due to lightning risk. Next launch date is is same time tomorrow (to be specific, one minute earlier for some reason).
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- sunflower_01 4y ago
  > one minute earlier for some reason I might be wrong but my thoughts were that they altered the minute to launch at 14:14:14 (at least in my timezone) This might also be completely wrong but today they would've launched the 13th at 14:15 (13 14 15).
  - stronglikedan 4y ago
    I like this theory better than mine. My jaded view of bureaucracy has me thinking that there are additional fees for delaying the launch 24 hours or more.
    - deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
- goodcanadian 4y ago
  This is almost certainly due to the fact that a full rotation of the Earth is shorter than a day. As the Earth moves around the sun, it has to turn slightly further than a full rotation to bring the sun back to the same position in the sky. Additionally, Earth's position relative to Jupiter will have changed slightly.
  - dabluecaboose 4y ago
    Off the top of my head I'd have to say the planetary ephemerides are more of a factor than the earth's rotation. That much we have pretty down pat, otherwise they'd just announce it's at (Day+23.6h)
throw_a_grenade 4y ago
Did not launch today for the risk of lightning.
kej 4y ago
Tangentially related, but if you haven't read 17776: What Football Will Look Like in the Future, it's an excellent example of using hypermedia to tell a story (and isn't really about football): https://www.sbnation.com/a/17776-football https://www.sbnation.com/a/17776-football
- LatticeAnimal 4y ago
  That was beautifully told. Thank you for sharing
- uhtred 4y ago
  That was about as fun to read as Blindsight by Peter Watts.
  - NikolaNovak 4y ago
    Hah yes, I think it evokes the feel of Peter Watts but also qntm / Sam Hughes even more! Mostly in the constant "what the ___ am I reading/watching/thinking right now"
- yalue 4y ago
  Jon Bois is a genius, and this is the main example I return to when tempted to think that hypermedia is just a gimmick. It takes a special type of creativity to not just make it feel "tacked on." Perhaps the light jazz and dated look of the google maps visuals just meld well with the nostalgia evoked by the content of the story. The text alone would probably work as a good scifi short, but the additional material makes it so much more dramatic.
- moffkalast 4y ago
  Well that's gotta be by far the most depressing utopia I've ever seen put into text.
- temp0826 4y ago
  Has there been any word on the third part of the series? 20020 came out then allegedly 20021 was coming out "soon", but didn't seem to ever materialize.
teh_klev 4y ago
Scott Manley did quite a good video explaining the mission and the space craft's journey: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mEehdFt9Yw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mEehdFt9Yw
lostgame 4y ago
If 2001 taught us anything, it's that this mission is doomed.
recursinging 4y ago
We designed and built the RIME antenna for this craft. It deploys to 16 meters long and weighs only 1.5 kg! See [1] for some more info. If you are already in, or are willing to relocate to southern Germany, I'm looking for flexible, multi-domain software engineers to build out our small team here at SpaceTech. Check my profile if you are interested. Looking forward to a successful launch tomorrow! [1] https://spacetech-i.com/news/news-details/spacetech-antenna-for-juice-rime-installed-and-ready-to-fly https://spacetech-i.com/news/news-details/spacetech-antenna-...
- forgotthepasswd 4y ago
  Nice video on the link! I like how those "1-G challenges" were solved.
  - recursinging 4y ago
    Indeed, the length of this antenna required some creativity. We have some really cool, high-tech solutions [1] for these "1-G challenges" as well. [1] https://carbospacetech.com/innovations/zero-g-robot/ https://carbospacetech.com/innovations/zero-g-robot/
- codethief 4y ago
  I had a brief look at the open positions listed on your website. The only (pure) SWE role that doesn't require a degree in electrical or aerospace engineering seems to be this one: https://spacetech-i.com/career/open-positions/jobs/software-engineer-factory-automation-m-f-d https://spacetech-i.com/career/open-positions/jobs/software-... ?
  - recursinging 4y ago
    Yes, that's the role I'm looking to fill at the moment, but it's a small company, and the horizontal coupling is tight. A SWE here will be confronted with many hands-on EE and ME challenges as well (hence the on-site requirement). People who thrive in such environments are a good fit.

181 points by laktak 4y ago

That mission features a complex trajectory that will use a lot of gravity assist to get to Jupiter. It will actually take eight years to get there, while Juno needed five and the Voyagers only two. Why do recent missions choose to do that? Is that a cost saving measure?

dogma1138 4y ago
The voyagers were launched within very specific window iirc which is why they managed to get to the outer planets so quickly. Also the voyagers only did a flyby so they could afford to go as fast as they want as they didn’t needed to enter orbit. The length of time to get to Jupiter is pretty much dictated by orbital mechanics. As well as your ability to slow down and actually get into orbit instead of just doing a flyby. So the longer journey is likely a combination of the launch vehicle, the cruise stage vehicle and how much fuel they want to dedicate into getting into orbit vs the mission since the probe is expected to visit multiple moons it’s likely that they prioritize the fuel for in mission orbit corrections so they are taking a longer and slower approach.
- exitb 4y ago
  Well, sure, the window was very specific to visit multiple planets, but Jupiter was the first stop. Similar Earth-Jupiter configuration happens every year.
  - avar 4y ago
    The ISS made a "stop" in my general vicinity earlier today by your definition of "stop".
    - exitb 4y ago
      Sorry, English it not my first language, I meant it as a first destination, it obviously just flew by.
  - dogma1138 4y ago
    Jupiter makes an orbit around the sun once every 12 years there likely are years where it is closer to earth than others. Also there are years when it’s retrograde and there are years when it’s prograde so there is that too. With Voyager it also wasn’t just Jupiter it was an alignment of all the planets which is far rarer. And again voyager didn’t entered orbit it had a very brief flyby of Jupiter. Cassini also took a decade to reach Saturn because it needed to enter orbit around it and its moons.
detuur 4y ago
The Voyager missions were able to use a rare and convenient alignment of the planets that would slingshot them into deep space. Juno is orbiting Jupiter itself, which is not a hard thing to do in our solar system. JUICE is attempting flybys of several of Jupiter moons, to end up orbiting around Ganymede. This is a much more delicate orbital insertion and has much stricter requirements for the gravity assists on its way there.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
bauruine 4y ago
JUICE has a launch mass of 5,963 kg while Juno had 3,625 kg and Voyager only 721.9 kg. I guess it may be a limit of the launch vehicle and the mass the spacecrafts have.
- JanKanis 4y ago
  Indeed. The same rocket will give a light probe a much higher velocity than a large probe. The launch vehicle for JUICE is the Ariane 5 ECA which can launch 16 tonnes to low earth orbit[1], while the Titan IIIE that launched the Voyagers had a capability of 15.4 tonnes to a (lower) low earth orbit[2]. So the current launch vehicle is a bit more powerful, but not 8 times as much. There are some more powerful (and more expensive) rockets active at the time, but nothing 8 times as powerful as the Titan IIIE. So NASA has the choice of 1) launching a lighter/smaller probe with less scientific capabilities and endurance, 2) spend $$$ and time developing a much more powerful launch vehicle, or 3) have a few years of patience waiting for JUICE to get to Jupiter on a slower trajectory. Jupiter has already been visited by multiple probes so sending a small and not very capable probe would not gain us much scientifically. (But this option was taken with the New Horizons probe to Pluto some years ago.) (2) Wouldn't actually be faster and much much much more expensive (see how long the SLS rocket is taking to get done. But mr. Musk is taking this route too with SpaceX's Starship, so this will be an option in the future if all goes well). So that leaves option 3, which NASA has taken. They could probably have opted for an existing more powerful and expensive launcher to shave some years off the transit, but they preferred to wait a bit longer and not spend that money. [1]: http://www.astronautix.com/a/ariane5eca.html http://www.astronautix.com/a/ariane5eca.html [2]: http://www.astronautix.com/t/titaniiie.html http://www.astronautix.com/t/titaniiie.html
  - dividedbyzero 4y ago
    > So NASA has the choice of ... > So that leaves option 3, which NASA has taken. As far as I'm aware, JUICE is an ESA probe. NASA is providing one of the instruments, but I believe that's it.
mpweiher 4y ago
The Voyagers took advantage of a special constellation that doesn't happen often: "In the 1960s, mission designers at JPL noted that the next occurrence of a once-every-175-year alignment of the outer planets would happen in the late 1970s. A spacecraft could take advantage of this opportunity to fly by Jupiter and use its gravity to bend its trajectory to visit Saturn, and repeat the process to also visit Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto." https://www.nasa.gov/feature/45-years-ago-voyager-1-begins-its-epic-journey-to-the-outer-planets-and-beyond https://www.nasa.gov/feature/45-years-ago-voyager-1-begins-i...
- perihelions 4y ago
  That didn't affect the Earth-Jupiter leg, which was direct.
  - GravitasFailure 4y ago
    If I'm reading the specs correctly the Titan IIIE was a significantly more powerful vehicle than the Ariane 5 while launching a much smaller payload. JUICE also has to be going slow enough to enter orbit without carrying an insane amount of fuel for braking while Voyager just did a flyby.
    - perihelions 4y ago
      - "Titan IIIE was a significantly more powerful vehicle than the Ariane 5 while launching a much smaller payload" Yes, with a fourth stage. (I don't think it's particularly that modern rockets can't integrate such a solid-rocket boost stage, but rather there's no payload that needs this). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_(rocket_stage) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_(rocket_stage) - "JUICE also has to be going slow enough to enter orbit without carrying an insane amount of fuel for braking while Voyager just did a flyby" The flyby speeds are similar; but JUICE takes a time to get to that speed. It's not really that difficult to capture into Jupiter. Parent's link [3] says it's only 900 m/s for JUICE. Part of the reason is the extremely deep gravity well; and another is that the moons are large enough to give you effective gravity assists, within the orbit of Jupiter.
eep_social 4y ago
Efficiency [1] in the form of reduced delta-v requirements [2]. The “yellow book” assessment study report probably has even more details [3]. [1] https://theconversation.com/the-much-anticipated-juice-mission-to-jupiter-launches-today-heres-what-it-might-discover-203669 https://theconversation.com/the-much-anticipated-juice-missi... [2] https://www.lpi.usra.edu/opag/mar2012/presentations/Friday/5_JUICE_Summary.pdf https://www.lpi.usra.edu/opag/mar2012/presentations/Friday/5... [3] https://sci.esa.int/web/juice/-/49837-juice-assessment-study-report-yellow-book https://sci.esa.int/web/juice/-/49837-juice-assessment-study...
- perihelions 4y ago
  Here's a key figure [3]: - "The mass injected into the Earth escape trajectory would be 4800 kg (without launch adapter), with a hyperbolic escape velocity of 3.15 km/s, which increases to 9.5 km/s after the last Earth swing-by" The Voyagers were launched directly to hyperbolic excess of >10 km/s — comparable to the speed JUICE will reach on its third flyby, of Earth, in 2029. https://sci-hub.ru/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.06.013 https://sci-hub.ru/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.06.013 ("C₃ of... 105.5 km²/s² and 102.4 km²/s² for Voyagers 1 and 2, respectively [75]")
  - mytailorisrich 4y ago
    Voyager was also only weighing 773kg. The mass of JUICE is probably a big parameter here.
euroderf 4y ago
I wonder what the predictions are like. When it finally gets to Jupiter, eight years from now, do we know now where the moons will be ? To what accuracy ?
- hermitcrab 4y ago
  I believe orbits are chaotic over a timespan of many millions of years (due to weak interactions with multiple other bodies), but accurately predictable over a human lifespan.
  - euroderf 4y ago
    I just wonder whether they can say that, on date&time X1 (98% sure to be accurate within E1 hours) we know satellite Z will be X2 thousands of km away (98% sure to be accurate within E2 km).
shagie 4y ago
https://trajbrowser.arc.nasa.gov/traj_browser.php https://trajbrowser.arc.nasa.gov/traj_browser.php In particular https://trajbrowser.arc.nasa.gov/traj_browser.php?NEAs=on&NECs=on&chk_maxMag=on&maxMag=25&chk_maxOCC=on&maxOCC=4&chk_target_list=on&target_list=Jupiter&mission_class=oneway&mission_type=rendezvous&LD1=2015&LD2=2030&maxDT=9.5&DTunit=yrs&maxDV=7.0&min=DV&wdw_width=-1&submit=Search#a_load_results https://trajbrowser.arc.nasa.gov/traj_browser.php?NEAs=on&NE... This EVEEJ route doesn’t appear to be in the trajectory list, but it’s interesting to explore and see the various windows.
belter 4y ago
[1]: "From Earth to Jupiter...JUICE trajectory is designed by ESOC Mission Analysis team. It is the result of an optimization, iterated with ESA project and Airbus teams, aiming at maximizing the dry mass at launch, keeping the total mass within the launcher capabilities and minimizing the transfer duration, while respecting other mission constraints, like total radiation dose, minimum Sun distance and maximum eclipse duration..." [1] - "JUICE interplanetary operations design drivers and challenges" - https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2018-2493 https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2018-2493 This is also an interesting Thesis on optimization required for the flybys due to the uncertainty of the Moons positions on arrival : "Preliminary Navigation Analysis for the Flyby Tour of ESA’s JUICE Mission" - An investigation on the trajectory correction maneuvers design https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:455ec2e9-a36b-445c-a9ae-ef6acbbf58f8/datastream/OBJ/download https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:455ec2e9...
saberdancer 4y ago
Cost saving as there is no prestige or gain in coming fast or first. Probes are also bigger and heavier.
usrusr 4y ago
Much higher confidence to not mess up those gravity assists? Control and sensors have come a long way since then
Sharlin 4y ago
The Voyagers, besides their much lower mass, were flyby missions. They could afford to be fast because they didn’t need to slow down for orbit insertion. NASA’s Europa Clipper, due to launch in Oct 2024 on a Falcon 9, will take 5.5 years to get to Jupiter. The Congress directed NASA to investigate the option to launch it on an SLS, should one be available (it won’t, and it would be ridiculously expensive) – it would have been able to send the probe on a direct ~1.5 year Hohmann transfer to Jupiter without gravity assists, but no other existing launch vehicle could do that.
rbanffy 4y ago
It's always a tradeoff. For every kilogram of propellant you save on the trip, you get one extra kilogram for the payload. Also, you may end up bumping into payload limits of the launcher itself, so you can get there, but you'll need to take the scenic route with fewer delta-v tolls.
vikingerik 4y ago
It's cost saving, but the cost saved is really weight (mass) of the fuel. Using the gravity assists means you can save on fuel and use that mass for the spacecraft and its instruments instead. JUICE masses 2400 kg, where Juno is 1600 and the Voyagers were 700.

fbn79 4y ago

Save the date. If all goes right, expected arrival 2031.

speps 4y ago
"Alexa, set a reminder for juice in July 2031"
- retSava 4y ago
  "I'm sorry, I didn't understand that. Here are some shopping results for furniture and sexual performance enhancer pills."

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

WeylandYutani 4y ago

ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS, EXCEPT EUROPA. ATTEMPT NO LANDING THERE. USE THEM TOGETHER. USE THEM IN PEACE.

belter 4y ago
Now that you mention that...The mission will conclude with a crash on Ganymede. I guess from then on a bunch of Tardigrades will be the new population. Surprised they went with this decision.
- calcifer 4y ago
  > Surprised they went with this decision. ESA explains it like this [1]: > Category II missions are flyby or orbiter missions that venture to worlds where there may be some possibility of life, but the chances of contamination are slim. Then there's category III, where the chances of contamination are deemed greater. > The planetary protection classification for Ganymede is driven by the likelihood that living organisms from Earth, brought to Ganymede by the spacecraft, can make their way down to the ice-ocean interface [...] In turn, this likelihood is deemed so low for Ganymede that it justifies a category II protection level, allowing for the spacecraft to be disposed on Ganymede's surface. [1] https://www.space.com/europe-juice-jupiter-mission-planetary-protection https://www.space.com/europe-juice-jupiter-mission-planetary...
- pklausler 4y ago
  If tardigrades can survive launch, deep space, Jovian orbital conditions for years, and a crash on Ganymede, and then be able to reproduce, maybe they deserve to be there.
  - belter 4y ago
    That is no problem for tardigrades. "Tiny animals survive exposure to space" - https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/Research/Tiny_animals_survive_exposure_to_space https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Ex...
- 4y ago

robin_reala 4y ago

Launch scrubbed due to lightning risk. Next launch date is is same time tomorrow (to be specific, one minute earlier for some reason).

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
sunflower_01 4y ago
> one minute earlier for some reason I might be wrong but my thoughts were that they altered the minute to launch at 14:14:14 (at least in my timezone) This might also be completely wrong but today they would've launched the 13th at 14:15 (13 14 15).
- stronglikedan 4y ago
  I like this theory better than mine. My jaded view of bureaucracy has me thinking that there are additional fees for delaying the launch 24 hours or more.
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
goodcanadian 4y ago
This is almost certainly due to the fact that a full rotation of the Earth is shorter than a day. As the Earth moves around the sun, it has to turn slightly further than a full rotation to bring the sun back to the same position in the sky. Additionally, Earth's position relative to Jupiter will have changed slightly.
- dabluecaboose 4y ago
  Off the top of my head I'd have to say the planetary ephemerides are more of a factor than the earth's rotation. That much we have pretty down pat, otherwise they'd just announce it's at (Day+23.6h)

throw_a_grenade 4y ago

Did not launch today for the risk of lightning.

kej 4y ago

Tangentially related, but if you haven't read 17776: What Football Will Look Like in the Future, it's an excellent example of using hypermedia to tell a story (and isn't really about football): https://www.sbnation.com/a/17776-football https://www.sbnation.com/a/17776-football

LatticeAnimal 4y ago
That was beautifully told. Thank you for sharing
uhtred 4y ago
That was about as fun to read as Blindsight by Peter Watts.
- NikolaNovak 4y ago
  Hah yes, I think it evokes the feel of Peter Watts but also qntm / Sam Hughes even more! Mostly in the constant "what the ___ am I reading/watching/thinking right now"
yalue 4y ago
Jon Bois is a genius, and this is the main example I return to when tempted to think that hypermedia is just a gimmick. It takes a special type of creativity to not just make it feel "tacked on." Perhaps the light jazz and dated look of the google maps visuals just meld well with the nostalgia evoked by the content of the story. The text alone would probably work as a good scifi short, but the additional material makes it so much more dramatic.
moffkalast 4y ago
Well that's gotta be by far the most depressing utopia I've ever seen put into text.
temp0826 4y ago
Has there been any word on the third part of the series? 20020 came out then allegedly 20021 was coming out "soon", but didn't seem to ever materialize.

teh_klev 4y ago

Scott Manley did quite a good video explaining the mission and the space craft's journey: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mEehdFt9Yw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mEehdFt9Yw

lostgame 4y ago

If 2001 taught us anything, it's that this mission is doomed.

recursinging 4y ago

We designed and built the RIME antenna for this craft. It deploys to 16 meters long and weighs only 1.5 kg! See [1] for some more info. If you are already in, or are willing to relocate to southern Germany, I'm looking for flexible, multi-domain software engineers to build out our small team here at SpaceTech. Check my profile if you are interested. Looking forward to a successful launch tomorrow! [1] https://spacetech-i.com/news/news-details/spacetech-antenna-for-juice-rime-installed-and-ready-to-fly https://spacetech-i.com/news/news-details/spacetech-antenna-...

forgotthepasswd 4y ago
Nice video on the link! I like how those "1-G challenges" were solved.
- recursinging 4y ago
  Indeed, the length of this antenna required some creativity. We have some really cool, high-tech solutions [1] for these "1-G challenges" as well. [1] https://carbospacetech.com/innovations/zero-g-robot/ https://carbospacetech.com/innovations/zero-g-robot/
codethief 4y ago
I had a brief look at the open positions listed on your website. The only (pure) SWE role that doesn't require a degree in electrical or aerospace engineering seems to be this one: https://spacetech-i.com/career/open-positions/jobs/software-engineer-factory-automation-m-f-d https://spacetech-i.com/career/open-positions/jobs/software-... ?
- recursinging 4y ago
  Yes, that's the role I'm looking to fill at the moment, but it's a small company, and the horizontal coupling is tight. A SWE here will be confronted with many hands-on EE and ME challenges as well (hence the on-site requirement). People who thrive in such environments are a good fit.