>Or, OpenAI added a calculator function. Furthermore, I would add: No lol. The test doesn't have to be mental arithmetic. and accuracy mistakes creep in at lar

>Or, OpenAI added a calculator function. Furthermore, I would add: No lol. The test doesn't have to be mental arithmetic. and accuracy mistakes creep in at large numbers for multiplication. That's not how calculators work i'm sure you know >ChatGPT hasn't "learned" anything outside of what exists in it's model. I'm sorry...and you have? >If it is an AI-based response, it's still derived from token-based inferencing. Um...Ok? Lol >One run of asking ChatGPT something is not enough to prove much of anything. You can run this on gpt-4 as much as you like. the results are the same. It knows addition. >They will find tokens for 'dig' and 'it', as well as 'add', 'car' and 'ry'. They will not find internalized understanding of the concept of math. That's...not how that works lol, You don't probe neurons and see tokens. https://clementneo.com/posts/2023/02/11/we-found-an-neuron https://clementneo.com/posts/2023/02/11/we-found-an-neuron Weights don't store the data they train on like that. They are essentially configuration settings.