4 ms·
Assuming you are responding to the article and not the comments here, i think you should read the article as the author agrees entirely with what you are saying
by zzzeek 4y ago
Assuming you are responding to the article and not the comments here, i think you should read the article as the author agrees entirely with what you are saying.
- ttpphd 4y agoI am not sure I agree with that assessment. The author describes a large language model as having unconscious thoughts.
- antiterra 4y agoThe author explicitly states that analogies to human thought are inaccurate. The purpose of the analogies is describe a mental model of the kinds of things GPT-4 can do or not do.
- ttpphd 4y agoThen let's say the point of disagreement between me and the author is that I would prefer to abandon the analogy for something that lets me both reason and communicate more clearly, while the author appears to prefer to keep the analogy they have identified as flawed.
- newswasboring 4y ago> while the author appears to prefer to keep the analogy they have identified as flawed. All analogies are flawed, some are useful. /Smug
- baq 4y agoThe author is describing a computer with a very peculiar computation model and lots of information stored in ROM making analogies to how humans solve problems along the way.