5 ms·
Because in Australia there is rule of law. In China it is rule by law.
by tuxpenguine 3y ago
Because in Australia there is rule of law. In China it is rule by law.
- t-writescode 3y agoThat sounds like something that would look great on a t-shirt but is ultimately meaningless.
- tuxpenguine 3y agohttps://vannormanlaw.com/rule-law-vs-rule-law/ https://vannormanlaw.com/rule-law-vs-rule-law/
- t-writescode 3y agoScanning the internet for examples of China being a rule-by-law country consistently presents opinion pieces, or opinion pieces by other names that seem little more than propaganda. China has many, many problems; but "rule by law" doesn't look very different from numerous places that would absolutely claim to be "rule of law"; and so, to me, it remains a propagandized term with a meaning that's used primarily against sets of rules and rulers we don't like.
- tuxpenguine 3y agoI see your point, I am sorry to hear that you feel this way, you feelings are valid. As someone who moved from China to the US, I feel I can appreciate the difference a lot more, on a personal level.
- raxxorraxor 3y agoThen perhaps appreciating the freedom supplied by not putting everything under government control is worth looking into.
- cute_boi 3y agoat the end both are same... Don't believe me look at those leaks.
- DoItToMe81 3y agoThat's simply a buzzword that does not reflect reality. Australia has clauses all throughout its federal law restricting due process, especially for "terrorism" accusations. There are also no Miranda rights for crimes that can carry a penalty of more than five years.
- jostiniane 3y agomy authoritarian government is better than yours