The way you phrased it kind of dismisses the difference between bad and good though. On one side there are the Sacklers getting people hooked on what amounts to

The way you phrased it kind of dismisses the difference between bad and good though. On one side there are the Sacklers getting people hooked on what amounts to legal heroin, which evolves into an addition to illegal street heroin and really is a detriment to society (though society having caused that with changing prescription regimes is also very much to blame). On side of good is the pharmaceutical companies selling, no shit, cures for a specific type of cancer in a pill. One is trying to reduce their sentence from having done bad things; using their influence for their own selfish benefit, and the other is trying to make it so they can help people more - using their influence for the greater good. There's a distinction between the two that I can make out, anyway.