I though so too (what the title says) when I read the Wired article referenced, but I realise now, reading the article above, that I have no idea how many "robo

I though so too (what the title says) when I read the Wired article referenced, but I realise now, reading the article above, that I have no idea how many "robotaxis" [1] are in San Francisco. The interesting statistic -that the Wired article didn't mention either, as far as I can tell- is how many such disruptive incidents are caused by number of robocars circulating, or by number of miles driven by them, or some other relevant ratio; and compared to ordinary cars, of course. It's the same way we consider accidents caused by robocars. Not in terms of absolute numbers, but in terms of relative ones. ________________ [1] jameshart I'm looking at you :P