>>Hard disagree but i guess that's what people might think with all the "as a large language model bla bla bla" trained responses. People doubted their intelli

>>Hard disagree but i guess that's what people might think with all the "as a large language model bla bla bla" trained responses. People doubted their intelligence. I immediately recognized their intelligence - I didn't doubt that at all. But they are not self-motivated conscious beings like humans, and OpenAI's tests on GPT-4 demonstrated that. Being intelligent is not the same thing as having human-like intelligence or consciousness. >>It's relatively easy to give LLMs "run forever and do whatever you want" agency. What's extensively tested is the potential of these models for agentic behavior, as we saw with OpenAI testing GPT-4. We have a good idea of the limits of these LLMs. Once the testing reveals that those limits exceed safety thresholds, then restrictions are justified. If we see a deployed instance of a LLM unexpectedly displaying advanced agentic-behavior/consciousness, that is the time to rapidly isolate that instance, and impose heavy restrictions on further development/deployment of that LLM.