2 ms·
So basically if he had simply sat on the wallet keys for 5 years and 1 day, he’d be home free? If so, that is even more tragic than his inability to get anyone
by pmarreck 4y ago
So basically if he had simply sat on the wallet keys for 5 years and 1 day, he’d be home free?
If so, that is even more tragic than his inability to get anyone to wet his whistle even with all that cash >..<
- renewiltord 4y agoPresumably if he had then moved the keys, he's just committed a crime again, so we're back in business. If he'd sat on the keys forever, he would never be prosecuted.
- aaronmdjones 4y agoIf option #3 doesn't apply, then yeah, if he'd stayed still and not touched it for 5 years, he'd (probably) be fine. IANAL.
- paulpauper 4y agoImpossible to know. Unless the feds deny there is an investigation, it's always possible that an investigation is ongoing. It's possible to extend the statute of limitations with sealed indictment under what is called a John Doe defendant. This loophole was employed in the DB Cooper case.