3 ms·
I'm not concerned with whether what's covered by the notch is empty or not. Chrome has tabs that would be covered by the notch, but its largely irrelevant, I ca
by adam_arthur 4y ago
I'm not concerned with whether what's covered by the notch is empty or not. Chrome has tabs that would be covered by the notch, but its largely irrelevant, I can still click it or swap to that tab easily enough.
Similar to how the notch doesn't materially degrade video content, despite covering some aspects of the video. We've seen iPhone make the choice to intentionally obscure a portion of app content for years without any major concerns.
- hombre_fatal 4y agoFair enough. But it's why the notch space doesn't feel like pure waste. If you right-click -> "Get info" on most applications, there's a checkbox for "Scale to fit below built-in camera (notch)". I've only had to use that for one game and iirc Parallels.app that were rendering on top of the notch. It would be nice if you could force the behavior per app with that, but it's only to fix apps that, I suppose, use some drawing API that lets them render on top of the notch.