> Natural language is a pretty fantastically bad interface for specifying unambiguous, repeatable, and reliable tasks I agree. I think people are fooled by the

> Natural language is a pretty fantastically bad interface for specifying unambiguous, repeatable, and reliable tasks I agree. I think people are fooled by the implicit knowledge that most humans have. They make decisions about the details, where in programming you have to tend to each detail. That's roughly equivalent effort in natural language. For some problems, probably harder in natural language. I still think it's a great advancement. It opens programming to the masses, and the LLM can probably teach you the things you need to know to advance your competency.