3 ms·
I'll pass, but thank you. I was simply answering someone's question about why we're seeing a lot of visceral reactions around this subject on HN and I attempted
by jjulius 4y ago
I'll pass, but thank you. I was simply answering someone's question about why we're seeing a lot of visceral reactions around this subject on HN and I attempted, at least, to provide a general answer without seeming biased about the subject one way or the other (hence the phrase, "agree with him or not"). Perhaps I failed there, but hey, at least I tried. C'est la vie.
Your responses, however, appear to want me to push beyond what I was answering and start arguing in defense of whatever words you tried putting into my mouth with your last response. Not only is that not at all what I set out to do[1], but it's also a bad faith argument on your part. That's not the kind of discussion I feel like having right now.
Enjoy your day! :)
[1]Edit: At the end of the day, my initial post in this thread can basically be summed up as, "One hotly debated subject married another hotly debated subject to become a single giant hotly debated subject". That's all.