4 ms·

You've already been provided with all the breadcrumbs required to understand the key concepts. Your failure to engage with this information and follow the trail

• hutzlibu 4y ago
  Well, I never asked for your breadcumbs, but for a link where an actual virologist is saying anti vaxx people are the problem why polio wasn't eradicated, which is what this thread was about. The article is not saying anything about it and neither is any other literature about it, I have read so far. (not that I have read much about it, but a bit) And your failure to provide such a link and your fall back to "I provided you with all the breadcrumbs and the rest is up to you" reminds me actually very much of discussions with anti vaxx people I had, you seem to misstake me for. Lots of talk. But nothing solid to back things up. At least nothing, I debated. So sure, higher vaccination rates might help. I did not debate that. But if it would be as simple as that, then there wouldn't be a problem. Only if the required numbers could not be reached because of anti vaxxers - then you would have an point - but again - I am not aware of an actual virologists making that point in this specific instance. So you claim you are an biochemist? Great, but I hope you know, that doesn't make you an virologist. Because I am also not an IT security expert, because I studied IT. I think I have a vague understanding about both (virology and IT security). Enough to know, that both is freakingly complicated and in both sectors there is lots and lots of snake oil and self declared gurus who claim they have the solution. I rather stick with the experts with some reputation.