2 ms·

> State funding of media, regardless of how it’s structured, creates an obvious conflict of interest with editorial freedom. How is this not true of any fundin

> State funding of media, regardless of how it’s structured, creates an obvious conflict of interest with editorial freedom. How is this not true of any funding of media? At least with government funding—even if there is outright editorial control—in a democratic country, you as a citizen have the ability to vote on how you think that funding and control should be exercised. Furthermore, it is massively easier to get laws in place that mandate transparency for government-funded entities than for private ones, so whatever influences there may be on their reporting would be much more visible.

AmericanChopper 4y ago
The concern that media companies can have interests that don’t align with journalistic integrity does apply to any media company. Whenever you see Rupert Murdoch’s name being discussed, it’s probably in relation to this topic. However it is harmful in a unique way when the government creates a conflict of interest between editorial independence, and serving the states agenda, due to the way in which that undermines the principle that a democratic society requires freedom of the press.