3 ms·
>- payment from member stations (at least 31% of revenue) who are themselves supported by government funding I have a hard time understanding this as "state sp
by petsfed 4y ago
>- payment from member stations (at least 31% of revenue) who are themselves supported by government funding
I have a hard time understanding this as "state sponsored", much less as evidence that NPR has ceded editorial control. NPR estimates (and InfluenceWatch believes this estimate) that about 4% of their revenue ultimately comes from federal, state and local governments [0], via direct grants to NPR, and via grants to member stations that are in turn paid to NPR. InfluenceWatch, you'll note, is run by the Capital Research Center, a conservative think tank which has an axe to grind about NPR's apparent left-wing bias.
This feels a lot like the accusations against Bellingcat that they are state-sponsored/controlled. And I think those accusations are equally specious. Accepting money via indirect grants is not at all the same as accepting payment for invoiced work.
0. https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/national-public-radio-npr/#funding https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/national-public-ra...
- jacquesm 4y agoIndeed. Meanwhile, the message has had its intended effect and NPR is now seen as 'tainted' by the people who would do a lot better to listen more to NPR than to various other far more biased news sources. It's the same old playbook, and Musk getting away with this is highly annoying.