3 ms·

more ontopic, I think its indicative of a general exodus of brands in general as well. nobody wants to pay for the checkmark, nobody wants to have their brand

more ontopic, I think its indicative of a general exodus of brands in general as well. nobody wants to pay for the checkmark, nobody wants to have their brand identity or message challenged or negated by fly-by-night impostors, and most people have lost tolerance for the abdication of moderation and safe space for a modern brand in general. The time to close your account was arguably last November when leadership fired all the employees and locked themselves out of the headquarters. thats not to say theyre evacuating to another platform, just that 'no platform' is a safer option than twitter platform.

wpietri 4y ago
Yeah, agreed. I was one of the people who quit Twitter in November. It has been a real loss for me, going from 7k followers on Twitter to 0.1k on Mastodon. Especially now that I'll be soon starting a job hunt, I miss that. But when I review my reasons for leaving Twitter [1], I'm not regretting it. I would rather have no platform than that platform. And the calculation for brands is surely much more fraught. I expect NPR will be the beginning of a fair bit of large orgs quitting Twitter, either loudly or just tailing off. [1] https://twitter.com/williampietri/status/1593662348568326151 https://twitter.com/williampietri/status/1593662348568326151
- JieJie 4y ago
  I miss the opportunity to have my posts seen by people on Twitter, but I never had that many get seen in actuality. Your "rather have no platform than that platform" resonates with me. It would better if we had some way to follow the large number of valid sources of information from diverse variety of online sources within one application. Whether that ends up being Twitter, or some Federated system, I would prefer that it does not come under or remain under the control of a capricious overlord. I absolutely understand the frustration of people who are on Twitter just to do the business of journalism, cause it does not seem like a place that is all that conducive to the market for journalism or other writing. It seems more like a public-access text-based cable-news-outrage outlet these days. Whatever happens, someone please let me know where all the people working on AI end up, cause that's something I would like to follow without all the wailing and gnashing of teeth that happens on Twitter.
- hgsgm 4y ago
  Do people hire for (non-PR) jobs based on tweets?
  - wpietribs 4y ago
    [flagged]
    - dang 4y ago
      Personal attacks aren't allowed. We've banned this account. Breaking HN's rules like this will get your main account banned as well, so please don't. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
  - wpietri 4y ago
    I doubt it. But it's a great way to find out about opportunities. I've had 3 jobs that I only heard about because somebody mentioned it on some social medium. One was on Twitter, one Facebook, and one in a specialist Slack.
  - macintux 4y ago
    I found a tech evangelist job via an informational account I ran for a language community, and was hired in part because of it. I suppose that’s PR, although I eventually switched to engineering.

wpietri 4y ago

Yeah, agreed. I was one of the people who quit Twitter in November. It has been a real loss for me, going from 7k followers on Twitter to 0.1k on Mastodon. Especially now that I'll be soon starting a job hunt, I miss that. But when I review my reasons for leaving Twitter [1], I'm not regretting it. I would rather have no platform than that platform. And the calculation for brands is surely much more fraught. I expect NPR will be the beginning of a fair bit of large orgs quitting Twitter, either loudly or just tailing off. [1] https://twitter.com/williampietri/status/1593662348568326151 https://twitter.com/williampietri/status/1593662348568326151

JieJie 4y ago
I miss the opportunity to have my posts seen by people on Twitter, but I never had that many get seen in actuality. Your "rather have no platform than that platform" resonates with me. It would better if we had some way to follow the large number of valid sources of information from diverse variety of online sources within one application. Whether that ends up being Twitter, or some Federated system, I would prefer that it does not come under or remain under the control of a capricious overlord. I absolutely understand the frustration of people who are on Twitter just to do the business of journalism, cause it does not seem like a place that is all that conducive to the market for journalism or other writing. It seems more like a public-access text-based cable-news-outrage outlet these days. Whatever happens, someone please let me know where all the people working on AI end up, cause that's something I would like to follow without all the wailing and gnashing of teeth that happens on Twitter.
hgsgm 4y ago
Do people hire for (non-PR) jobs based on tweets?
- wpietribs 4y ago
  [flagged]
  - dang 4y ago
    Personal attacks aren't allowed. We've banned this account. Breaking HN's rules like this will get your main account banned as well, so please don't. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- wpietri 4y ago
  I doubt it. But it's a great way to find out about opportunities. I've had 3 jobs that I only heard about because somebody mentioned it on some social medium. One was on Twitter, one Facebook, and one in a specialist Slack.
- macintux 4y ago
  I found a tech evangelist job via an informational account I ran for a language community, and was hired in part because of it. I suppose that’s PR, although I eventually switched to engineering.