4 ms·
It's sad to see that so far much of the conversation here is going exactly how Twitter would prefer it goes... focused on whether 1% of funding qualifies as "st
by bink 4y ago
It's sad to see that so far much of the conversation here is going exactly how Twitter would prefer it goes... focused on whether 1% of funding qualifies as "state affiliated". When the real story is that Musk decided to arbitrarily target an organization based on his presumptions about its political beliefs.
- JohnFen 4y ago> When the real story is that Musk decided to arbitrarily target an organization based on his presumptions about its political beliefs. I'm assuming that people aren't dwelling on that because everyone already agrees that's the case.
- jacquesm 4y agoPlenty of evidence that this isn't true, unfortunately. And that's precisely the point that the GP made: people are using this as an opportunity to split hairs over the percentage of control, rather than to identify this as yet another way in which Elon Musk abuses his ownership of Twitter.