Not really, you said the technical drawings had to be validated against the technical requirements. By Clark's account, those two were in sync. What wasn't in

Not really, you said the technical drawings had to be validated against the technical requirements. By Clark's account, those two were in sync. What wasn't in sync was the ports "general ideas" about what they wanted from the transaction and the technical requirements they produced attempting to encode those "general ideas". Unfortunately there's not a great way to validate those, at least that I see. Pay for a better engineer to sit in on your years of meetings rambling about what the "future of the port" will be?