4 ms·
> You can argue that triple equals is a confusing syntax To me this is the problem with triple equals. The different types of equality should be explicit in th
by giantrobot 4y ago
> You can argue that triple equals is a confusing syntax
To me this is the problem with triple equals. The different types of equality should be explicit in their use rather than overloading a sigil.
- flir 4y agoShouldn't that logic also apply to ==, which overloads the assignment operator (=) in the same way?
- hn_throwaway_99 4y agoVery much agree with this one, but would phrase it as using = to represent assignment was the bad original choice.
- giantrobot 4y agoIf the average keyboard had support, characters like ≡ could be used as the equivalence sigil and ≢ for not equivalent.