4 ms·
They are not suspected to, they have been caught in consensual acts, they were caught red handed to be hypocrites. A gay person isn't a hypocrite for being gay
by PartiallyTyped 4y ago
They are not suspected to, they have been caught in consensual acts, they were caught red handed to be hypocrites.
A gay person isn't a hypocrite for being gay, a gay person condemning and harming other gay people is a hypocrite.
- throwawaylinux 4y agoAnd I suppose those who harm gay people by bullying them and publicly shaming them deserve everything that's coming to them, especially if they're doing from a hypocritical and misguided delusion of righteousness... Again missing the point. It isn't a challenge to defend oneself, it's an invitation to reflect. Less talking, more thinking.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- PartiallyTyped 4y agoAgain completely missing the point, nobody is bullying them because they are gay, nor are they being bullied. They are facing the consequences of purposefully breaking the social contract by harming LGBT people.
- throwawaylinux 4y ago> Again completely missing the point, nobody is bullying them because they are gay, nor are they being bullied. That's not what the list says.
- PartiallyTyped 4y agoso why aren’t my gay friends on that list? After all, if they are being bullied because they are gay, all gay people should be listed on there.
- throwawaylinux 4y agoPresumably because their behavior does not breach what the list maker deems acceptable. > After all, if they are being bullied because they are gay, all gay people should be listed on there. I don't know what you mean. That's not a gotcha.
- PartiallyTyped 4y ago> Presumably because their behavior does not breach what the list maker deems acceptable. So it’s not because they are gay, it’s their behaviour. I am glad we finally agreed though I am sad we had to spend as many steps to reach this conclusion.
- throwawaylinux 4y ago[flagged]
- PartiallyTyped 4y agoYou seem to have confused your insults and arrogance for insight. There's no ideology involved, only breaking the social contract and hurting others. I'd refer you to Scanlon.
- throwawaylinux 4y agoAlways funny to hear people making lists of minorities and undesirables defend themselves. None of what you're coming up with is new.
- anigbrowl 4y agoYour point is misdirection.
- throwawaylinux 4y agoWhat do you think my point is, and what is it "misdirecting" from?