4 ms·
There’s a huge middle ground between ChatGPT and an “open source unrestricted model”. OpenAI’s playground lets you specify your own system prompts for GPT4, whi
by brookst 4y ago
There’s a huge middle ground between ChatGPT and an “open source unrestricted model”. OpenAI’s playground lets you specify your own system prompts for GPT4, which allows for a lot more latitude in user prompts and responses.
But if you’re looking to generate truly racist and vile stuff, yes, you probably will need a model with no training or inference filters. I’m not sure anyone’s investing in building that though.
- sebzim4500 4y ago>I’m not sure anyone’s investing in building that though. LLaMA already exists.
- aaomidi 4y agoThat has filters in its weights
- lightbendover 4y agoState actors assuredly are (in addition to e.g. LLaMa); the cost of pysops, especially social engineering, will be reduced to pennies on the dollar.
- brookst 4y agoI don’t those state actors are releasing models as open and free though, as parent was looking for.
- simion314 4y agoThe number of people that want to create racist content is small, the issue I had is when the API is itself racist, as I mentioned in other places, you give it safe prompt and the API generates unsafe stuff. There is already unsafe stuff in ChatGPT they only added a pathetic filter on top and made us p[ay for it\s failures.
- DonHopkins 4y ago>The number of people that want to create racist content is small... No it's not. Elon Musk thinks there's a huge demand for racist AI, and he's probably right, or at least alt-right. Elon Musk yearns for AI devs to build 'anti-woke' rival ChatGPT bot: https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/06/ai_roundup/ https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/06/ai_roundup/