9 ms·
> Yeah, it’s shockingly immoral to not give children drugs that have existed for something like 0.01% of human existence. What is the argument here? Drugs have
by Timon3 4y ago
> Yeah, it’s shockingly immoral to not give children drugs that have existed for something like 0.01% of human existence.
What is the argument here? Drugs haven't existed for long, so it's okay to prevent people from using them? I'm sure we can all agree it would be shockingly immoral to steal cancer drugs from a patient, even if it is natural development.
- klyrs 4y agoThis jumped out at me too. Yes, it would be shockingly immoral to stop giving children antibiotics. Which I mention because penicillin was developed at around the same time as synthetic estrogen and testosterone. And penicillin could kill me due to an anaphylactic allergy, and it's largely considered safe by medical standards.